Regardless if the dialogue just isn't of a (demi-)god but of transgressive saints, as in Hudson 1989 (cited under Bhakti), the theological difficulty posed continues to be that exemplified by this legal god par excellence. This anthology was at first meant to resituate divergent theoretical techniques to this conversion situation https://vashikaran86420.free-blogz.com/77412410/considerations-to-know-about-bhairav